DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Showcase your materpieces here for the group

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby Nillus » Sun Apr 27, 2014 4:59 pm

Image
Image

Close shave. Last summer. VLATs are GOOD things.
Last edited by Nillus on Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Nillus
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 5:59 pm

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby Knotty » Sun Apr 27, 2014 6:24 pm

That's a bit close Salty , good to see the sky crane on the job !!
Knotty
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 6:39 am

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby tor lives » Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:01 pm

Holly crap!!! :shock:
That is way to close for comfort.
We don't need one VLAT DC-10 in this country.....we need a bloody squadron of em!!
Ray
tor lives
 
Posts: 4289
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 am

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby Cap'n Wannabe » Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:12 pm

No we don't Ray.....


Sorry, just missing the debates of a time past :twisted: :twisted:
Pretending to do it TAC style with the big boys since 1987
Also, we don't need no steenkin' VLATs!
Cap'n Wannabe
 
Posts: 1388
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Craigieburn, Victoria

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby tor lives » Sun Apr 27, 2014 9:14 pm

Cap'n Wannabe wrote:No we don't Ray.....


Sorry, just missing the debates of a time past :twisted: :twisted:



Your right...we need TWO squadrons of em!!! :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFRCcnRpUwI

I remember being told by a certain self-appointed "expert" :roll: on another site the VLATs would never be effective in built-up urban areas....clearly !!!! :lol:

Ray
tor lives
 
Posts: 4289
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 am

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby Capt NG » Mon Apr 28, 2014 7:00 am

Hes only saying that Ray because they are stuck in the past.. They obtain knowledge on a subject, engage in cognitive vomit with other like minded sycophants and then go tell everyone that this is how it is.. :? :roll:
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times... I remember when the air was clean and the sex was dirty..
Capt NG
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby Adam the Akrodude » Mon Apr 28, 2014 10:24 am

Here's an idea, how about slug us with a whopping $10 per tax payer VLAT levy? That will generate $110 Million. How many VLAT's can we hire for that annually? I know, I know - how could such a pathetically simplistic idea like this work?
That last mob in power put each and every one of us in the can for around $28,000 each (deficit dived by total no. taxpayers), I'm happy to chip in another $10-$20 dollars for some added fire insurance - ah, put it on the tab! Aren't our armed forces another kind of insurance? Just because some asset isn't used, doesn't mean it's absolutely necessary. The F-111 never dropped a bomb in anger, but it was our big stick in this region. Other developed nations have these sort of fire fighting assets, why not us?

As USAF Capt. Murphy experienced in his ejection seat testing, over a period of time/series of events, if there is a chance of something going wrong, it will eventually. If all this global warming hoo haa can be believed, summers will get longer and our land drier. There then is every chance of 2-3 large fires happening at the same time across our country at some stage surely? Does this not suggest then we need a more multi-tiered approach to fire fighting?

I know I'm largely preaching to the converted here. Interesting that one model can generate such discussion.
Adam the Akrodude
 
Posts: 2819
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 1:02 pm
Location: 100,124,672,897 Bifrost Rd, Valhalla, Asgard

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby Tony P » Mon May 19, 2014 10:39 am

You don’t concentrate on risks. You concentrate on results. No risk is too great to prevent the necessary job from getting done- Chuck Yeager.
User avatar
Tony P
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:54 pm

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby tor lives » Mon May 19, 2014 1:47 pm




Ummmmm.....could someone please tell me again why we don't need these things!!!
Ray
tor lives
 
Posts: 4289
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:01 am

Re: DC-10 VLAT fire bomber

Postby Capt NG » Mon May 19, 2014 2:21 pm

I miss those VLaT discussions..... Their opinion is worth jack shidt anyway.
It's hard for me to get used to these changing times... I remember when the air was clean and the sex was dirty..
Capt NG
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2014 11:23 am

PreviousNext

Return to Member's Completed Models

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests